Two years
ago I went to my eye doctor for my annual checkup. The doctor had me take a new test (new at his
office). His assistant had me look through
a scope at a dot on a grid and indicate when I saw movement. The movement seemed difficult to detect from
normal vibrations in the room, but I did my best to appease them. The doctor said I scored very low and was
predisposed for age related macular degeneration. AMD is a very serious disease resulting in blindness
and I don’t want to sound as if I don’t take it seriously. The doctor prescribed a vitamin supplement
that I could conveniently buy from his office.
I received 3 months of a high dose capsule and instructed to take 2 each
day and never, ever miss a dose. The
supplement is very expensive and I was told to return in 6 months for another
exam.
I returned
in 6 months, retook the test, which seemed very subjective to me. I could see movement, but wasn’t sure it was
the movement they were looking for. The
doctor said my results improved slightly, but I was still in danger of
AMD. I took more expensive supplements
and was retested 6 months later. This
cycle went on for two years. One time I
failed the test so bad, they said my result scored near zero. I explained it seemed very subjective and
asked to retake it. I then received a
numeric score that was near normal. The
doctor said to keep taking the supplements conveniently sold at his
office.
I stopped by
his office one day to restock my supplement supply and the assistant remarked
that a large number of the doctor’s patients were taking them. While I was slightly suspicious before, I
became highly suspicious at this time. I
explained this to my wife, who is a scientist and medical researcher. She read some studies and had me look at one
published by the Cochrane Group in London.
The eye health division of Cochrane concluded the supplements provided
no benefit.
Recently I
switched eye doctors and asked about my predisposition to AMD. My new doctor said my macular looked
fine. I explained the test taken and
supplements prescribed. She said the
test was referred to as the Amsler grid and the proper application was to
detect whether there was a break in the grid or the lines were distorted. Movement detection was not part of the test
and there are no numerical scores given.
I looked at the Amsler grid she held in front of me and the lines looked
perfectly straight. She said the supplements wouldn’t hurt, but she doesn’t
recommend them either. I announced I had
been scammed. My new doctor didn’t
disagree, but was cautious to avoid the word scam. She said her desire was to secretly go to
other doctor offices for eye examinations and see what happens elsewhere. I
wish she would; I was scammed.
There are also other eye vitamin and mineral supplement that can help you and are in your budget.
ReplyDelete